Freedman, Ethan
UNI: ehf2124
4/24/26
Columbia University School for Social Work, New York
Submitted in partial fulfillment as A Board Analysis Paper within the requirements for Columbia’s School for Social Work program and Prof. Jeanette Takamura’s Board Development and Management class.
Acknowledgements
In introducing the following work, I would like to begin by acknowledging the traditional, ancestral, and unceded territory on which we learn, work, and resource from at Columbia University School of Social Work is land of the Lenape and Wappinger indigenous peoples. Let us commit ourselves to the struggle against the forces that have dispossessed the Lenape, Wappinger, and other indigenous people of their lands.
I would also like to acknowledge Professor Prof. Jeanette Takamura and their facilitation of SOCWT712B. With Prof. Takamura’s lecturers, recommended readings, and my additional thoughts – this piece took form. Moreover, all my peers in class who contributed to discussions and building ideas that related to the present topic. With these acknowledgements, I present my following work.
Introduction: SIECUS and their Board
In 1964, Dr. Mary Calderone co-founded what would become SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change on a conviction then considered radical; young people deserve honest, comprehensive, and affirming information about their bodies and relationships. More than 60 years later, Executive Director Callie Simon heads SIECUS as the only national organization exclusively dedicated to sex education policy and advocacy, operating at the crossroads of public health, civil rights, and education reform in one of the most hostile political climates the field has ever faced. Project 2025, executive orders dismantling diversity and equity infrastructure, and a surge of state level censorship bills have made comprehensive sex education politically charged, and SIECUS is a primary organizational line of defense. While SIECUS’s board governance reflects a genuine and structurally intentional alignment with its equity centered mission, vision, and values, identifying where to deepen youth representation, strengthen development competencies, and embed PROP principles internally – remain the unfinished governance work.
SIECUS Mission, Vision, Values, and Board Alignment:
SIECUS’s mission frames sex education as a vehicle for social change and asserts that “social justice is inclusive of sexual and reproductive rights" (SIECUS, n.d.). Its vision is universal access to comprehensive, inclusive sex education, and its values center equity, justice, human rights, and the dismantling of systems of oppression across intersections of race, gender, sexuality, and class (SIECUS, n.d.). The board composition reflects these commitments with fervor and intentionality. With a total of eleven board members, Board Chair John Santelli, MD MPH (Columbia University / Guttmacher Institute) grounds SIECUS’s advocacy in academic and public health credibility. Secretary Kimberly Inez McGuire is a leading reproductive justice advocate whose career spans grassroots organizing and national policy. Nimra Chowdhry of the Center for Reproductive Rights brings legal and human rights expertise, while Naomi Washington-Leapheart utilizes faith and reproductive justice advocacy to extend the board’s reach into communities where sex education intersects with religion. Academic researchers Myeshia Price (Indiana University) and Kimberly Chestnut (University of Wyoming) round out a board that White (2014) would recognize as practicing stewardship thinking with each member acting as a custodian of the institution's long-term purpose. While there are more members on SIECUS’s board, the individuals mentioned signal a strong alignment between board members and SIECUS’s mission and vision.
SIECUS SWOT Analysis and Operation Environment:
SIECUS”s strengths lie in its sixty year sustainability, singular national positioning, and a coalition infrastructure of SEPAC and the Sex Ed Coalition that amplifies organizational impact well beyond its $1.18 million budget. In the fiscal year of 2025, its research informed over 300 scholarly publications and generated a 4.3 billion global media reach (SIECUS, 2025; Keela, n.d.). Its core weaknesses are financial with a heavy reliance on foundation grants that leave SIECUS exposed when funders navigate anti-DEI pressures and a small staff that limits. Opportunities have paradoxically expanded as political attacks elevated sex education’s public salience, drawing HIV prevention, reproductive justice, and transgender rights organizations into an alliance. Moreover, SIECUS added six new coalition partners and awarded 13 microgrants totaling $10,000 in FY2025 (SIECUS, 2025). The threats to SIECUS are severe and environmental with executive orders, HHS censorship directives targeting the Teen Pregnancy Prevention and Personal Responsibility Education Program funding streams, and more than 650 tracked legislative bills, with 80% being regressive. Sener et al (2011) would classify SIECUS within a context that is highly dynamic and complex, and demands strategic board engagement as a governance imperative.
SIECUS Board Roles and Responsibilities:
In relation to SIECUS’s mission, vision, values, SWOT analysis, and environment, the board's responsibilities span three interconnected domains. Strategically, it must serve as a thought partner to the CEO in affirming organizational direction amid rapidly shifting legislative conditions, consistent with Charan’s (2011) value creation phase of board evolution where directors contribute to rather than ratify organizational decisions. In leadership stewardship, the board must recruit, evaluate, and support the CEO in direct relation to mission context, and given that the executive director is also SIECUS’s primary public facing policy voice, this partner is especially consequential (White, 2014). Fundraising is the third domain, and BoardSource (2021) finds that many nonprofit boards over index on development at the expense of strategic engagement. The risk is inverse at SIECUS with a board that has expertise heavily in policy and may underinvest in leveraging personal networks for contributed income, a gap that financials dependent on grants necessitate addressing urgently.
Analysis of SIECUS Board Composition:
Evaluated through Meier’s (2019) Strategic Board Composition Matrix, SIECUS’s board demonstrates deliberate design with professional expertise spanning public health medicine, reproductive law, health and gender studies research, faith based organizing, and national policy advocacy. Moreover, the board is majority women with meaningful representation of women of color, a composition that mirrors the communities most harmed by sex education inequity and that is foundational to governance credibility (BoardSource, 2021). However, gaps exist as the concentration of academic and advocacy expertise may undersupply skills in financial management, private sector fundraising, and crisis communications, which are increasingly critical given SIECUS’s grant dependency and the intensity of current politics. Notably, youth voices are absent from SIECUS governance despite young people being the organization’s primary constituency. Recruitment appears to center mission alignment and professional networks, a rational approach that would benefit from the systemic gap analysis Meier's (2019) matrix enables.
Critical Onboarding Information for New Board Members:
Onboarding sets the tone for board member engagement and governance effectiveness (Forbes Business Council, 2023). For new SIECUS directors, five areas are critical. Primarily, the legislative landscape requires fluency in current federal and state threats as a prerequisite to meaningful strategic contributions. Coalition architecture pertaining to how SEPAC and the Sex Ed Coalition function and SIECUS’s convening role within them is also poignant. The financial stability of SIECUS and their budget scale, grant dependency, and funding trends are also essential information for every governance decision. Moreover, the organization's culture and commitments to PROP adjacent directives embeds equity and anti-oppression values internally and board norms must reflect this. Lastly, the boundaries in board management are important as the CEO holds the public policy voice and board members must support without subverting executive leadership (Forbes Business Council, 2023).
SIECUS Board in Tandem with Analysis of the Executive Director
Callie Simon recently stepped up to the executive director position in April, 2026, with a substantive background in global adolescent sexual and reproductive health leadership (ASRH). Prior to SIECUS, Simon led global ASRH strategy at Save the Children, overseeing education and advocacy projects across 19 countries and fostering partnerships across more than 130 country offices. Before that, she contributed technical expertise at Pathfinder International. Shen and Cannella (2019) demonstrate that executive professional experience shapes organizational strategy in lasting ways, and Simon’s grounding in international ASRH programming is directly relevant to SIECUS’s evidence based advocacy model and its commitment to framing sex education as a universal right. Simon also appears as a personal monthly donor in SIECUS’s FY2025 Annual Report, signaling deep personal investment in the mission that reflects the kind of values alignment the board should seek in executive leadership. Executive compensation is not disclosed in the Annual Report, but is reported in their Form 990. That being said, the board should benchmark Simon’s compensation against comparable advocacy organizations using a process of independent board approval, comparable data, and concurrent documentation (Nonprofit Law Blog, 2023). Evaluation should center metrics aligned with their mission, citing legislative wins, coalition growth, and budget sustainability. No formal public evidence of succession planning exists, considering Christine Soyong Harley recently stepped down. That being said, their Annual Report names managers across state policy, federal policy ,and communication suggesting development of a deep internal leadership the board can cultivate.
PROP Dynamics Through the Lens of an Executive
If one were to enter SEICUS in an executive role below the executive director, they might arrive with genuine respect for the organization’s PROP commitments and readiness to interrogate whether those commitments extend from rhetoric into structure. The PROP framework calls on organizations to “intervene and interrupt systemic oppression and explore how white supremacy has been positioned as a dominant system” (Altaha et al., 2023, p. 110), a charge that applies to advocacy and internal governance structures. SIECUS is unusual in naming the dismantling of systems of power and oppression as institutional purpose rather than peripheral value, and its board comparison, redistributive microgrant program, and Executive Director global ASRH experience all reflect genuine structural commitments in spite of the current administration's efforts to undo these organizational values. Yet, a board composed largely of credentialed academics and policy professionals, however racially diverse, may inadvertently center institutional expertise over lived community experience. This is a meaningful tension at an organization whose theory of change depends on centering communities most harmed by sex education inequity. BoardSource (2021) finds nearly half of nonprofit executives report boards lack sufficient community representation to build authentic trust, and SEICUS’s absence of youth governance voices reflects this gap. As a new executive, I would advocate for formal governance pathways for young people and community advocates in the form of advisory councils, liaison roles, and reserved board seats. It is important to examine whether PROP principles, despite external rigor, operate internally in compensation equity, promotion paths, and the distribution of power between the national office and stakeholders.
Conclusion: Building Upon the Board
SIECUS’s board governance reflects a genuine and structurally legible alignment between a mission centered in equity and the composition, expertise, and strategic posture of the directors who steward it. At a moment of unprecedented political assault on the organization's foundational work, that alignment is essential and admirable. The governance work ahead involves building on this foundation to deepen youth and community representation, formalize succession planning, strengthen development competencies, and ensure PROP commitments are as structurally embedded internally as they are in the advocacy SIECUS leads. Boards that govern well, as White (2014) argues, are stewards of something larger than themselves. SIECUS’s board has the orientation, but the question is whether it will develop the determination to lock those values in structurally.
References
Altaha, N., et al. (2023). Narratives for uprooting anti-Black racism in higher education: Developing a power, race, oppression and privilege framework in social work. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 93(2–4), 106–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377317.2023.2266026
BoardSource. (2021). Leading with intent: BoardSource index of nonprofit board practices. BoardSource.
Charan, R. (2011). The three phases of a board’s evolution. In Boards that deliver: Advancing corporate governance from compliance to competitive advantage (pp. 3–13). John Wiley & Sons.
Forbes Business Council. (2023, October 3). 15 essential steps when onboarding a new board member. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesbusinesscouncil/2023/10/03/15-essential-steps-when-onboarding-a-new-board-member/
Keela. (n.d.). SWOT analysis for nonprofit: A how-to guide, example, and template. Keela. https://www.keela.co/blog
Meier, S. S. (2019). Strategic board composition matrix (Worksheet A & B). In The board-building cycle: Finding, engaging, and strengthening nonprofit board members (3rd ed.). BoardSource.
Nonprofit Law Blog. (2023, May 11). How should your nonprofit set the compensation of its executives? Nonprofit Law Blog.
Sener, I., Varoglu, A., & Aren, S. (2011). Board composition and organizational performance: Environmental characteristics matter. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1481–1493.
Shen, W., & Cannella, A. A. (2019). CEO characteristics: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. Accounting & Finance, 59(2), 933–968.
SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change. (n.d.). About us. https://siecus.org/about-us/
SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change. (2025). FY2025 annual report. https://siecus.org
White, B. J. (2014). Understand the role: Stewardship thinking. In Boards that excel: Candid insights and practical advice for directors (pp. 27–50). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.